A better Employee Motivation through the Application of Public Feedback Processes
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Job Appraisals
- Art: Diplomarbeit
- Autor: Marek Worsch
- Abgabedatum: Oktober 2004
- Umfang: 92 Seiten
- Dateigröße: 899,2 KB
- Note: 1,3
- Institution / Hochschule: Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Berlin Deutschland
- ISBN (eBook): 978-3-8324-8467-5
-
ISBN (Paperback) :
978-3-8324-8467-5 P - ISBN (CD) :978-3-8324-8467-5 CD
- Sprache: Englisch
- Prämierung:
- Arbeit zitieren: Worsch, Marek Oktober 2004: A better Employee Motivation through the Application of Public Feedback Processes, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
- Schlagworte: Equity Theory, Bias, Politics, Team Cohensivness
In den Warenkorb
74,00 €
Diplomarbeit von Marek Worsch
Abstract:
The Diploma Thesis at hand considers the interdependence of employee motivation on the one and feedback and job appraisal processes in organisations on the other hand.
Basically, today’s job appraisal procedures have one major disadvantage. They rarely comprise more than a subjective assessment of employee performance. This assessment is normally carried out by an employee’s superior. In this thesis, it will be argued that through the dynamics of bias and politics in organisations, the validity of job appraisal information is significantly distorted. Hereby, the effectiveness of job appraisals is affected negatively since they cannot serve as a reliable basis for personnel decisions. But more important, the distorted information is likely to result in overseeing or ignoring an individual’s achievements in the workplace. Lack of appreciation of one’s effort and, additionally, the feeling of being treated inequitably compared to co-workers may erode an employee’s motivation. However, in a world of accelerating globalisation and thus increasing competition, a motivated workforce is the key to an organisation’s success.
The thesis will propose a potential solution for this dilemma - public feedback. This means that the information gained through job appraisals will not be discussed ‘one-on-one’, involving only superior and subordinate. Rather, the discussion is extended to the latter’s peers. The prerequisites for and the proceeding of this approach to employee evaluation will be provided. Also, the thesis covers the analysis of a survey. This was accomplished to test the acceptance of a public feedback process among a sample of white collar workers. The results show a general acceptance and appreciation of the idea of feedback in public.
Table of Contents:
| List of Charts and Tables | III | |
| List of Charts | III | |
| List of Tables | III | |
| Abbreviations | IV | |
| 1. | Introduction | 1 |
| 1.1 | Choice of the Topic | 1 |
| 1.2 | Problem and Objectives | 2 |
| 1.3 | Methodology | 3 |
| 2. | Employee Motivation | 5 |
| 2.1 | Definition | 5 |
| 2.1.1 | Origin of the Term | 5 |
| 2.1.2 | Motivation in the Field of Business Administration | 5 |
| 2.2 | The Need for Employee Motivation | 7 |
| 2.3 | Theories on the Content of Motivation | 10 |
| 2.3.1 | Motivation as a Hierarchy of Needs | 11 |
| 2.3.2 | Motivation as a Twofold Phenomenon | 13 |
| 2.3.3 | Money as a Motivator | 15 |
| 2.3.4 | Conclusions | 16 |
| 3. | Feedback | 18 |
| 3.1 | Definition of Feedback | 18 |
| 3.1.1 | Origin of the Term | 18 |
| 3.1.2 | Feedback in the Field of Business Administration | 18 |
| 3.1.3 | Job Appraisals as Information Basis for Feedback | 19 |
| 3.2 | The Need for Feedback | 21 |
| 3.3 | The Need for Public Feedback | 26 |
| 3.3.1 | The Significance of Equity | 26 |
| 3.3.2 | Sources for Inequity Resulting From Feedback and their Consequences | 28 |
| 3.3.2.1 | Distortion Due to Errors Out of the Appraisal Process | 29 |
| 3.3.2.2 | Distortion Due to the Person of the Assessor | 30 |
| 3.3.2.2.1 | The Affect of Appraisals by Bias | 30 |
| 3.3.2.2.2 | The Affect of Appraisals by Politics in Organisations | 32 |
| 3.3.2.3 | The Consequences of Distorted Feedback | 35 |
| 3.3.3 | Implications | 37 |
| 3.4 | Conclusions | 39 |
| 4. | A Model for a Public Feedback Process | 41 |
| 4.1 | Similar Approaches in Practice | 41 |
| 4.1.1 | Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) | 41 |
| 4.1.2 | National Health Service (NHS) | 42 |
| 4.1.3 | Critical Discussion | 43 |
| 4.2 | The Development of the Model | 45 |
| 4.2.1 | Basic Prerequisites | 45 |
| 4.2.2 | The Job Appraisal | 46 |
| 4.2.2.1 | Superior-appraisal | 47 |
| 4.2.2.2 | Peer-appraisal | 48 |
| 4.2.2.3 | Self-appraisal | 49 |
| 4.2.3 | The Public Feedback Discussion | 50 |
| 4.3 | Acceptance of the Model in Practice | 53 |
| 4.3.1 | Conduction of the Survey and Basic Findings | 53 |
| 4.3.2 | Analysis of Questionnaires | 56 |
| 4.3.2.1 | General Analysis | 56 |
| 4.3.2.2 | Analysis of Interrelations | 58 |
| 4.3.3 | Implications | 61 |
| 4.4 | Summary | 62 |
| 5. | Résumé | 65 |
| 5.1 | Final Summary | 65 |
| 5.2 | Final Conclusions | 68 |
| 5.3 | Critical Reflection and Outlook | 69 |
| Bibliography | 71 | |
| Books and Journals | 71 | |
| Internet | 74 | |
| APPENDIX | 75 | |
| Questionnaires | 76 | |
| German Version | 76 | |
| English Version and Motivation of Questions | 79 | |
| Formulas | 84 | |
| Comprehensive Overview of the Results of the Survey | 85 |
In den Warenkorb
74,00 €
Link zur Arbeit:
http://www.diplom.de/ean/9783832484675
Arbeit zitieren:
Worsch, Marek Oktober 2004: A better Employee Motivation through the Application of Public Feedback Processes, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
Schlagworte:
Equity Theory, Bias, Politics, Team Cohensivness



