Towards an Integrative Approach to Alliance Failure
- Art: Diplomarbeit
- Autor: Jan-Philipp Büchler
- Abgabedatum: August 2003
- Umfang: 89 Seiten
- Dateigröße: 1,1 MB
- Note: 2,0
- Institution / Hochschule: Universität zu Köln Deutschland
- ISBN (eBook): 978-3-8324-9312-7
-
ISBN (Paperback) :
978-3-8324-9312-7 P - ISBN (CD) :978-3-8324-9312-7 CD
- Sprache: Englisch
- Prämierung:
- Arbeit zitieren: Büchler, Jan-Philipp August 2003: Towards an Integrative Approach to Alliance Failure, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
- Schlagworte: Strategische Allianz, Strategic Alliance, Kooperation, Joint Venture, Erfolgsfaktoren
In den Warenkorb
74,00 €
Diplomarbeit von Jan-Philipp Büchler
Abstract:
The past decade has seen increased academic interest in strategic alliances because alliances have developed to a centerpiece of corporate strategy. The number of newly formed alliances has been growing at more than 25 percent annually throughout the last decade and most large companies have at least 30 alliances; many have more than 100 in their alliance portfolio. According to empirical studies about 90 percent of the questioned companies are embedded in one or more alliances, which seem to be proliferating with increasing competition and globalization.
Yet despite the ubiquity of strategic alliances, reality shows that many alliances fail. They do not meet the goals of the parent companies and fall short of expectation for different reasons i.e. alliances do not perform as intended. Empirical researchers find that between 30 percent and 70 percent of alliances fail. However, there is neither a comprehensiv understanding of alliance failure and success nor a managerial framework that would allow to improve alliance performance.
Although a number of theoretical approaches as well as empirical studies have developed possible answers for the understanding of alliance failure by examining single factors, the review of the existing literature and investigation into the different theories shows that the reasoning is of a narrow view. To date, researchers mostly pay attention to individual aspects, but do not hold a holistic perspective. Most studies attribute failure to a wide range of factors including cultural, technical, financial, structural, and strategic aspects. The identified factors are neither wrong nor right but based on different assumptions and views that still remain unclassified, unstructured and incomparable. Due to overlaps, imprecise terms and a missing conceptual framework, the outcome is very limited in terms of explanation of alliance failure and success. Thus, the literature on alliance failure does not provide an adequate view of the interdependence and system of the identified factors.
Furthermore, researchers have not developed a multidimensional and systematic framework for the analysis of alliance failure and success so far. The importance of the interdependence amongst different alliance failure factors is not reflected in the existing literature.
Due to the high rate of failure of strategic alliances and the lack of a systematic and coherent understanding of the influencing factors of failure, the theoretical development of an integrated approach to alliance failure is more than overdue for scientific research as well as for managerial practice.
The objective of this thesis is to enhance the understanding of alliance failure and success in order to give implications for management. To this end, three sub-goals are derived:
Development of a multidimensional and coherent framework for further analysis of alliance failure and success. This framework will contain all of the identified factors for the success and failure of alliances.
Description of the interdependence amongst the dimensions of this framework.
Depiction of an integrative model of alliance failure with a special focus on the interdependences of the different dimensions and implications how to manage them added by practical examples.
This thesis consists of five major parts. After the introduction to the topic of strategic alliances and their failure, the second chapter focuses on a classification of alliances within the context of interorganizational forms of cooperation, i.e. as a third form of coordination aside from market and hierarchy. The basic nature of alliances is shown and the different forms of alliances are explained as well as the goals and motives for their formation. The understanding of the life cycle of alliances gives an insight into the dynamic evolution and change of alliances. Throughout the life cycle an alliance has to manage different success and risk factors driving alliance success or failure which are shown in detail. The analysis of these factors along the life cycle of an alliance also lays the foundation for the definition of alliance failure and success due to a certain understanding of the outcome of alliances.
The development of a framework for the analysis of alliance failure is the purpose of the third chapter. The framework interprets strategic alliances as systems consisting of at least two individual companies. They have an individual structure and they strive for their goals and strategies, the relationship among them, and the environmental constraints. These dimensions allow the classification of the existing approaches to alliance failure and success to the separate dimensions, thus capturing all separately identified factors. Afterwards, setting each of the dimensions as the prevailing determinant, whilst describing the influence on the other dimensions, shows the interdependences of the four dimensions on two different levels: single-firm level and alliance level. A matrix of these dimensions evolves by laying over each other. The third chapter closes with a synthesis dealing with the question of fit of the four dimensions and their influence on alliance performance by examining to what extent the junctions of the four dimensions might contain risk and failure factors on the alliance level.
The fourth chapter offers a first sketch of an integrated approach to alliance failure according to the theoretically developed framework. It allows situation-based hypotheses of alliance failure and success by offering functional chains of cause and effect of each interdependent factor. The insight for management is the attribution of risk and success factors to each of the linkages between the allying firms as seen below. The interdependences between the networked junctions of the four dimensions will be closely examined on the alliance level in order to understand the dynamics of the failure and success factors. Finally, a synthesis of the fit of the different dimensions and the integration of these dimensions that provide failure drivers present a systemic and multidimensional approach to alliance failure analysis in the last part of the fourth chapter.
The fifth and final chapter concludes with a summary of the outcome of this approach, reflects it critically and describes the implications for further research into strategic alliances. It also questions if different forms and sizes of alliances could result in different constellations of failure and success drivers, thus providing more or less stability of the alliance.
The major insight is, that the networked junctions of the dimensions contain failure drivers that dynamically enforce each other and lower the alliance performance due to the interdependence amongst them, which is based on the network character of alliances. Therefore, it is not a single factor leading to alliance failure, but the overall arrangement of interdependent failure drivers. These interdependences have been analyzed and described as chains of cause and effect by theoretical reflection and thought as well as empirical illustrations. The result is a more detailed and comprehensive understanding of how alliance performance is forced down, how failure originates and how to locate and address them in order to manage an alliance appropriately. Finally, a visual illustration of this integrated framework has been sketched in order to point out the interdependent relations of failure drivers.
Table of Contents:
| Contents | i | |
| List of figures | iii | |
| List of tables | iii | |
| Abbreviations | iv | |
| 1. | Introduction | 1 |
| 1.1 | Research problem | 2 |
| 1.2 | Procedure of the analysis | 3 |
| 2. | Alliances as a third form of coordination | 5 |
| 2.1 | The nature of alliances | 6 |
| 2.2 | Different forms | 8 |
| 2.3 | Goals and motives | 10 |
| 2.4 | Alliance life cycle | 14 |
| 2.5 | Success and risk factors | 17 |
| 2.6 | Alliance outcomes | 21 |
| 2.6.1 | Problems of performance measurement | 21 |
| 2.6.2 | Defining alliance failure | 23 |
| 3. | Development of a framework for the analysis of alliance failure | 25 |
| 3.1 | Theoretical development of a framework | 26 |
| 3.2 | Review of the existing approaches to alliance failure | 32 |
| 3.2.1 | Environmental approaches | 32 |
| 3.2.2 | Strategic approaches | 34 |
| 3.2.3 | Structure determined approaches | 36 |
| 3.2.4 | Behaviorist approaches | 40 |
| 3.3 | Interdependence of determinants for alliance failure | 45 |
| 3.4 | Synthesis | 50 |
| 4. | Integrated approach to alliance failure | 53 |
| 4.1 | Driving forces of alliance performance (environment) | 54 |
| 4.2 | Alliance strategy for competitive advantage (strategy) | 57 |
| 4.3 | Alliance governance, organization structure and resources (structure) | 61 |
| 4.4 | Alliance culture and process (behavior) | 64 |
| 4.5 | Synthesis | 66 |
| 5. | Conclusion and future perspectives | 68 |
| Bibliography | 71 |
3.2 Review of the existing approaches to alliance failure The classification of these approaches to the dimensions of this fourfold framework is important in order to get to know the different perspectives of each approach and to identify the domain of the different failure factors. According to the understanding of systemism, each of the four dimensions is equally important and is not dominated by another one, thus they are truly interdependent. However, the interdependence of the four dimensions of analysis is put aside in this section because here the focus is on the alignment of the existing theoretical approaches of alliance failure to the respective dimension. These approaches are basically limited to only one dimension of analysis. After having explained the existing approaches in the context of the respective dimension, the interdependence will be picked up and analyzed in the next section. [...]
The strategic alliance is modeled here as a separate entity evolving from cooperation between firm (x) and firm (y).108 The alliance boundary is illustrated by a dashed line that symbolizes its permeability due to the alliance – environment interaction and surrounds the entire alliance domain.109 Inside the alliance, the three internal dimensions of each partner firm intersect with each other constituting nine junctions that provide interdependent relations. In the further analysis, three different levels of interdependences can be distinguished within this framework. The first level of interdependences is restricted to the analysis of the individual firm containing the relations between the environment and the individual firm, as well as the interdependent relations of the internal dimensions within this single firm.110 The second level of interdependences deals with the alliance level including the relation of the environment and the alliance and also the junctions of the internal dimensions of the partners. The junctions form the core of the strategic alliance intertwining and meshing both partners and unite them in the strategic alliance, i.e. the super-system. The third level describes the interdependences of the junctions within the alliance.111 These junctions and the third-level interdependences between them are immanent to strategic alliances and separate them from market and hierarchy. They can be seen as the basis for social contracting and the evolution of emergent properties and dynamics, but could also contain inherent instabilities and risks due to the complexity of the interdependences. Therefore, in the following, it is assumed that drivers of alliance failure originate in those interdependences that are disrupted by irregularities, misfit, or external forces. Thus, the failure of alliances has to be analyzed by examining the various junctions and their interdependences within this interorganizational governance mode. [...]
boundary of the system is assumed to be in a state of dynamic interaction. According to a systemic view, the system’s interior dimensions and parts are also interdependently linked with each other.106 Referring to the analysis of alliances, the system level represents the strategic alliance consisting of at least two partnering firms that could be modeled as subsystems that contribute to the alliance. Adapting this model for the purpose of analyzing alliance failure, the subsystems have to be integrated in the framework due to the interfaces and additional interdependences arising from the cooperation between two originally independent organizations. These additional interdependences can be modeled as the junctions of the dimensions of both subsystems, as illustrated below.107 [...]
In den Warenkorb
74,00 €
Link zur Arbeit:
http://www.diplom.de/ean/9783832493127
Arbeit zitieren:
Büchler, Jan-Philipp August 2003: Towards an Integrative Approach to Alliance Failure, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
Schlagworte:
Strategische Allianz, Strategic Alliance, Kooperation, Joint Venture, Erfolgsfaktoren



