Going Public in the USA and the Valuation of IPOs
- Art: Diplomarbeit
- Autor: Marco Petersen
- Abgabedatum: März 2001
- Umfang: 193 Seiten
- Dateigröße: 754,0 KB
- Note: 1,0
- Institution / Hochschule: Fachhochschule Kiel Deutschland
- ISBN (eBook): 978-3-8324-4581-2
-
ISBN (Paperback) :
978-3-8324-4581-2 P - ISBN (CD) :978-3-8324-4581-2 CD
- Sprache: Englisch
- Prämierung:
- Arbeit zitieren: Petersen, Marco März 2001: Going Public in the USA and the Valuation of IPOs, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
- Schlagworte: Börsengang, Valuation, USA, Going Public, IPO
In den Warenkorb
58,00 €
Diplomarbeit von Marco Petersen
Abstract:
In the course of trade liberalization, globalization, and multi-national corporations, companies and private persons invest in and are financed by cross-boarder transactions. There are several key trends that are globalizing the world economy and driving business to become more multinational to survive and prosper.
The objectives of this thesis are to give an overview of the going public procedure and the registration requirements for U.S. stock exchanges. Hereby, the paper just focuses on the major U.S. stock exchanges NYSE, Nasdaq and the American Stock Exchange (Amex). Second, the paper gives on overview of valuation methods. However, the paper emphasizes only on those valuation approaches, which are used for valuing firms at IPOs. the thesis discusses the economical benefits of an initial public offering on U.S stock exchanges. the thesis gives recommendations for potential non-U.S. issuers that may pursue a listing on one of the U.S. stock exchanges.
Table of Contents:
| Table of Contents | III | |
| Tables | IX | |
| Figures | XI | |
| List of Appendix | XII | |
| Abbreviation | XIII | |
| Symbols | XVII | |
| 1. | Introduction | 1 |
| 1.1 | Relevance of the Topic | 1 |
| 1.2 | Objectives of the Thesis | 3 |
| 1.3 | Structure of the Thesis | 4 |
| 2. | The U.S. Stock Exchanges | 5 |
| 2.1 | New York Stock Exchange | 5 |
| 2.1.1 | Overview | 5 |
| 2.1.2 | The New York Stock Exchange Market Data | 6 |
| 2.1.3 | NYSE Listing Requirement | 7 |
| 2.2 | Nasdaq | 11 |
| 2.2.1 | Overview | 11 |
| 2.2.2 | Nasdaq Market Data | 13 |
| 2.2.3 | Nasdaq Listing Requirements | 14 |
| 2.3 | Amex | 18 |
| 2.3.1 | Overview | 18 |
| 2.3.2 | Amex Market Data | 19 |
| 2.3.3 | Amex Listing Requirements | 20 |
| 3. | The U.S. Regulations and Authorities | 21 |
| 3.1 | The SEC | 21 |
| 3.2 | The NASD | 23 |
| 3.2.1 | Profile of the NASD | 23 |
| 3.2.2 | NASD Regulation | 23 |
| 3.2.3 | The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. | 24 |
| 3.2.4 | American Stock Exchange LLC | 24 |
| 3.2.5 | NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. | 25 |
| 3.3 | State Regulations | 25 |
| 3.4 | Securities Act of 1933 | 26 |
| 3.4.1 | Registration requirements | 26 |
| 3.4.2 | Registration Exemption | 27 |
| 3.4.3 | Liabilities under the Securities Act | 29 |
| 3.5 | Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | 30 |
| 3.5.1 | Registration Requirements | 30 |
| 3.5.2 | Liabilities under the Exchange Act | 32 |
| 4. | American Depositary Receipts | 33 |
| 4.1 | Function of ADRs | 33 |
| 4.2 | Reasons for ADRs | 34 |
| 4.3 | Types of ADR Programs | 35 |
| 4.3.1 | Unsponsored versus Sponsored ADRs | 35 |
| 4.3.2 | Public versus Private ADR Programs | 36 |
| 4.3.3 | Non-Capital versus Capital Raising ADR Programs | 36 |
| 4.4 | The Depositary Bank | 39 |
| 4.5 | ADRs and Accounting Standards | 41 |
| 4.5.1 | Accounting Requirements for Non-U.S. Companies | 41 |
| 4.5.2 | Accounting According to Item 17 | 43 |
| 4.5.3 | Accounting According to Item 18 | 44 |
| 4.6 | The ADR Market | 44 |
| 5. | The IPO Team | 47 |
| 5.1 | Underwriters | 47 |
| 5.1.1 | Function of the Underwriter | 47 |
| 5.1.2 | Selecting the Underwriter | 48 |
| 5.1.3 | Types of Underwriting | 50 |
| 5.2 | Attorneys | 51 |
| 5.3 | Accountants | 52 |
| 5.4 | Financial Public Relations | 53 |
| 5.5 | Consultants and Advisors | 55 |
| 5.6 | Financial Printers | 56 |
| 6. | The IPO Process | 57 |
| 6.1 | Preparation and Organizational Change | 57 |
| 6.1.1 | The Company's IPO Maturity | 57 |
| 6.1.2 | Preparing for the Transition | 58 |
| 6.1.3 | Legal Preparation | 59 |
| 6.1.3.1 | Incorporating the Company | 59 |
| 6.1.3.2 | Legal Due Diligence | 60 |
| 6.1.4 | Financial Reporting | 61 |
| 6.1.4.1 | Preparing the Financial Reporting System | 61 |
| 6.1.4.2 | Financial Due Diligence | 62 |
| 6.2 | Registration Process | 63 |
| 6.2.1 | Registration Overview | 63 |
| 6.2.2 | Registration Statement | 63 |
| 6.2.3 | Waiting Period | 64 |
| 6.2.4 | SEC Review Process | 65 |
| 6.2.5 | Road Show | 66 |
| 6.2.6 | Quiet Period | 66 |
| 6.2.7 | Costs of Going Public | 67 |
| 6.3 | Registration on a National Stock Exchange and Nasdaq | 67 |
| 6.4 | Valuation Methods | 68 |
| 6.4.1 | Discounted Cash Flow | 70 |
| 6.4.1.1 | Terms of Cash Flow | 70 |
| 6.4.1.2 | DCF Models | 72 |
| 6.4.1.2.1 | Equity Approach | 73 |
| 6.4.1.2.2 | Entity Approach | 74 |
| 6.4.1.2.3 | Total Cash Flow Approach | 75 |
| 6.4.1.2.4 | Adjusted Present Value Approach | 75 |
| 6.4.2 | Multiples | 76 |
| 7. | Post-IPO Obligations | 79 |
| 7.1 | Continual Reporting | 79 |
| 7.1.1 | Periodical Reporting | 79 |
| 7.1.2 | Non-Periodical Reporting | 80 |
| 7.2 | SEC Rule 144 | 81 |
| 7.3 | Aftermarket Obligation | 82 |
| 7.3.1 | Stabilization Activities by the Underwriter | 82 |
| 7.3.2 | Investor Relation Program | 84 |
| 7.3.3 | Financial Community | 85 |
| 8. | Case Study EPCOS AG and Infineon Technologies AG | 87 |
| 8.1 | Company Description | 87 |
| 8.1.1 | EPCOS | 87 |
| 8.1.2 | Infineon | 88 |
| 8.2 | Deal Structure | 89 |
| 8.2.1 | EPCOS | 89 |
| 8.2.1.1 | Formation of the Corporation | 89 |
| 8.2.1.2 | The Offering | 90 |
| 8.2.1.3 | IPO Expenses | 91 |
| 8.2.1.4 | Use of Proceeds | 91 |
| 8.2.2 | Infineon | 92 |
| 8.2.2.1 | Formation of the Corporation | 92 |
| 8.2.2.2 | The Offering | 93 |
| 8.2.2.3 | IPO Expenses | 94 |
| 8.2.2.4 | Use of Proceeds | 94 |
| 9. | Economical Benefits of the IPO | 95 |
| 9.1 | Siemens' Divesting Benefits | 95 |
| 9.2 | Finance-political Opportunities | 98 |
| 9.2.1 | Widen the Shareholder Structure | 98 |
| 9.2.1.1 | General Reasons | 98 |
| 9.2.1.2 | U.S. Investors | 100 |
| 9.2.1.2.1 | Private Investors | 100 |
| 9.2.1.2.2 | Institutional Investors | 101 |
| 9.2.1.3 | Limitations of Institutional Investors | 103 |
| 9.2.1.4 | Success Factors | 104 |
| 9.2.1.5 | Investor Relations | 105 |
| 9.2.2 | Capital Raising | 107 |
| 9.2.2.1 | Aftermarket Trading in the U.S. | 111 |
| 9.2.3 | Reducing Cost of Capital | 113 |
| 9.2.3.1 | Cost of Capital Models | 113 |
| 9.2.3.2 | Capital Market Segmentation | 114 |
| 9.2.3.3 | Overcoming the Capital Market Segmentation | 115 |
| 9.2.4 | Mergers & Acquisitions Currency | 117 |
| 9.2.4.1 | Reasons for M&A | 118 |
| 9.2.4.2 | Using Stocks for M&A | 120 |
| 9.3 | Personal-political Opportunities | 122 |
| 9.3.1 | Management Stock Ownership | 122 |
| 9.3.2 | Employee Stock Ownership | 124 |
| 9.4 | Market-political Opportunities | 129 |
| 9.4.1 | Communication with Financial Community | 129 |
| 9.4.2 | Increasing Recognition | 131 |
| 9.4.2.1 | Image of the NYSE Listing | 131 |
| 9.4.2.2 | Increasing Recognition among Suppliers | 132 |
| 9.4.2.3 | Increasing Name Recognition among Customers | 132 |
| 9.4.2.4 | Increasing Name Recognition among Competitors | 133 |
| 9.4.2.5 | Image as a Global Player | 134 |
| 9.5 | Aftermarket Development | 135 |
| 9.5.1 | Financial Results | 135 |
| 9.5.1.1 | EPCOS | 135 |
| 9.5.1.2 | Infineon | 137 |
| 9.5.2 | Stock Performance | 138 |
| 9.5.2.1 | EPCOS | 138 |
| 9.5.2.2 | Infineon | 140 |
| 10. | Recommendation | 143 |
| 11. | Conclusion | 146 |
| Appendix A - EPCOS Offering | 148 | |
| Appendix B - EPCOS Selected Financial Data | 150 | |
| Appendix C - Infineon Offering | 152 | |
| Appendix D - Infineon Selected Financial Data | 155 | |
| References | 157 | |
| Interview Partner | 172 |
The WACC approach uses aggregate cost of capital. It distinguishes between the costs of equity and debt. The literature recommends the determination of the cost of equity based upon the CAPM240. The cost of debt is the actual rate at which the company can raise debt on the capital market. In the case of an IPO, the equity value is the crucial factor because the to be listed stocks have to be priced with an appropriate value. Since the result of the entity approach is the enterprise value, the equity value can be derived from this valuation241. The EV is decreased by net debt. Net debt is the result of interest bearing debt minus cash and cash equivalents. [...]
Under Rule 430A, the issuer has also the option to omit information relating the price of the securities and the offering date when requesting the SEC to declare the registration statement effective. The missing information has to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 in a final prospectus within five days214. 6.2.5 Road Show Prior to effectiveness, the underwriter may market the issue to the financial community, commonly called “road show”. The underwriter and the issuer will travel to potential investors in various financial centers such as New York, London, and Frankfurt promoting the IPO215. Through this stressful part of the IPO, the issuer and the underwriter will meet with analysts, fund and money managers, financial press, media, and other institutional investors such as insurance companies. The selling effort includes group or face-to-face meetings as well as telephone or videoconferences. During the road show, which is done after filing but prior to effectiveness, the issuer can only distribute information included in the preliminary prospectus. The SEC does not permit to distribute any other oral or written information. Moreover, they may place a tombstone216. A violation will delay the going public process. Of interest is that the company is still in the quiet period. 6.2.6 Quiet Period [...]
Once a registration statement is filed with the SEC, its staff will generally inform an issuer within five days of filing whether or not the documents will be reviewed. Registration statements filed by first-time issuer will be assigned to a full and thorough review210. The SEC staff will check for any inconsistency and make sure that the statement complies will all the SEC’s requirements. The SEC does not evaluate the investment worthiness of the company211. If the registration statement appears to afford inadequate disclosure through omission of material information or non-compliance with regulations, the SEC will address all aspects in a letter of comment (also called deficiency letter). Some comments will require changes in the disclosure in the prospectus other may require that amendments be furnished to the staff212. The issuer needs to reply to the comment letter with in 20 days. When the SEC considers that it has received a satisfying response it its comments, it advises the registrant that it is ready to declare the registration statement effective. Typically, the registration statement does not contain the offer price. The underwriter and issuer agree on the size and price of the offering after the subscription period213. The information is incorporated in an amendment to the registration statement, commonly called price amendment. The issuer requests the SEC to declare the issue effective upon filing of the amendment on the following day when the market opens. [...]
In den Warenkorb
58,00 €
Link zur Arbeit:
http://www.diplom.de/ean/9783832445812
Arbeit zitieren:
Petersen, Marco März 2001: Going Public in the USA and the Valuation of IPOs, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
Schlagworte:
Börsengang, Valuation, USA, Going Public, IPO



