What could outsourcing bring to Bulgaria in an enlarged Europe?
- Art: Diplomarbeit
- Autor: Plamen Alexandroff
- Abgabedatum: Dezember 2005
- Umfang: 195 Seiten
- Dateigröße: 1,5 MB
- Note: 1,0
- Institution / Hochschule: Universität Rousse Bulgarien
- ISBN (eBook): 978-3-8324-9766-8
-
ISBN (Paperback) :
978-3-8324-9766-8 P - ISBN (CD) :978-3-8324-9766-8 CD
- Sprache: Englisch
- Prämierung:
- Arbeit zitieren: Alexandroff, Plamen Dezember 2005: What could outsourcing bring to Bulgaria in an enlarged Europe?, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
- Schlagworte: Europäische Union, Osteuropa, Outsourcing, SWOT, Bulgarien
In den Warenkorb
68,00 €
Diplomarbeit von Plamen Alexandroff
Abstract:
Today there are numerous examples for the power of globalization. It brings together people living thousands of miles away from each other through the technology of Internet; allows them to taste fruits from the other side of the Earth; makes them feel the consequences from events that do not have a direct impact on their lives. The signs demonstrating the spread of economic globalization are more and more with each day and they could be noticed on wider and wider areas on the planet.
Global trade has proliferated, driven by individuals, huge multinational companies and countries. But so has done also the flow of capital and humans across the world, both in search of attractive places. The ever more complex system of international relations in each sphere is more and more controlled by international organizations, encompassing most of the countries in the world. Among these, the leading role has the World Bank, the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund.
But in these international bodies the leading role is played by trade groupings such as the EU or super-powers such as the USA. The least developed countries are isolated and suppressed by these super-blocs or –powers. Another major actor in the globalization process – the multinational company – has spurred the anger of ordinary people with its blunt behavior and no respect for the environment. For these reasons has emerged the antiglobalization movement, which is growing more and more.
The process of globalization has brought wealth to some and even deeper poverty to others, showing that it could offer many dangers but also many opportunities for the economic development of the countries. One of these opportunities is the offshore outsourcing. It could be defined as the process of entrusting a partner in a foreign with a complex long-term mission, defined in terms of results. Outsourcing in the manufacturing sector is nothing new and it has existed ever since the appearance of the first big companies in the beginning of the 20th century.
But in the last decade or so offshore outsourcing operations in the services sector have started to proliferate more and more, boosted by the emergence of the Internet, the modern means of communication and computer technology.
There could be defined several major types of outsourcing according to various criteria. A first group could be distinguished in accordance with the subject of the outsourced activities. Another one could be according to the level of commitment of the provider. The last group could be defined in terms of level of complexity.
With the growth of the offshore outsourcing industry there could be heard more and more protectionist voices in the client countries pleading for putting some limits to the unrestricted outsourcing trend in the services sector, which can affect negatively the life of an individual in a span of just 5-10 years. There is a big debate in the developed countries concerning the potential gains and losses from offshore outsourcing. But the empirical evidence demonstrates clearly that the fears are overestimated and actually offshore outsourcing is a powerful source for improving the efficiency of the economy and increasing the consumer welfare. The gains from offshore outsourcing are shared between the client and the supplier countries, so it is not a zero-sum but rather a win-win game. It brings higher productivity, better-paid jobs, increased consumer welfare and enhanced exports for the client countries and bigger employment, wages, exports, government revenues, etc. for the supplying country.
However, in order to get the fruits of outsourcing there should be available some preconditions. For the home (client) country these are flexible labor markets with a shortage of specific types of professionals; wage differences from the supplier country; liberal regulations and proper activities that could allow offshore outsourcing. The factors in the potential location for outsourcing are advantageous cost structure; sufficient labor pool; availability of skills and languages proficiency; proper infrastructure; protection of intellectual property and data security; government support activities, etc.
The examined empirical evidence from the major outsourcing suppliers suggests that this trend could also help Bulgaria in solving some of its main economic problems, connected to its coming accession to the European Union. Generally these problems could be summed up with the term „catching up” and they cover all areas of life. Some of the sharpest economic problems of the country are the very low living standard and wages; inadequate capacity to resist strong competition; high unemployment; and the lagging behind in technology, environmental protection; general efficiency of the economy, etc.
However, in order to understand how Bulgaria is positioned in relation to other outsourcing suppliers, an analysis of its main strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, as well as such of the major trends in social, technological, economic and political area is needed. Such analyses reveal that the country is relatively well-suited to develop successfully as an outsourcing supplier, especially in comparison to most of the current European suppliers. A further analysis of the possible impact of the European policies in the relevant areas tells that given the current trends and situation of the economy, Bulgaria should orient towards developing outsourcing capability in the services sector, since it is much more competitive than the other sectors of the economy.
A demonstration of the potential benefits from developing as an outsourcing destination could be found in the software and related services sector, which is working mainly on sub-contracting/outsourcing basis and with very high export intensity of about 80%. The developed three scenarios for the next five years show that the gains only from this small sector of the Bulgarian economy could be relatively big, given the present development and much bigger in case the government adopts a more proactive and supportive approach. Here are some examples:
Between $150 – 600 million worth of exports in 2008.
Between 180,000 – 260,000 of total employment generated.
Between $810 – 4,150 million of total contribution to the GDP of the country.
Some other sectors that are relatively well-suited to develop offshore outsourcing capabilities could be found in the industry. The emergence of Bulgaria as a European supplier in at least two or three of these sectors would generate immense benefits for the economic development of the country and would allow it to catch up with the average level in the EU in relatively short period, when compared to the present-day pace. The benefits that outsourcing could bring to Bulgaria are the same as those that it has already brought to other supplier countries – bigger GDP, wages, exports, government revenues; enhanced infrastructure, human resources competitiveness, stability in the country, etc.
On the micro-level it would encourage the participating companies to invest more in training and education of their staff; increase the motivation of employees; bring improvement in the quality of the delivered products or services. However, the most profound change on the micro-level would be the spread of outsourcing on the local level among indigenous companies. So, developing as an outsourcing destination could have the potential to make Bulgaria a more efficient and finally more competitive economy, able to find its own place under the sun of the European Union.
Table of Contents:
| CHAPTER 1 GLOBALIZATION – A DECESIVE POWER TODAY | 6 | |
| Introduction | 6 | |
| 1. | Definition of Globalization | 7 |
| 2. | Signs of globalization | 10 |
| 2.1 | Increased role of the international organizations and treaties | 10 |
| 2.2 | Reduction of Tariffs | 12 |
| 2.3 | Increased role of transnational corporations | 12 |
| 2.4 | Increased trade flows | 13 |
| 2.5 | Increased capital flows | 15 |
| 2.5.1 | Foreign direct investment | 15 |
| 2.5.2 | International financial assistance | 16 |
| 2.6 | Labor flows and remittances | 16 |
| 2.7 | Regional blocs and trade agreements | 18 |
| 2.8 | International tourist flows | 18 |
| 2.9 | Spread of information and communication | 19 |
| 3. | Forms of Economic Globalization | 20 |
| 3.1 | At the company level | 20 |
| 3.1.1 | Functional forms | 20 |
| 3.1.2 | Forms according to their scope | 22 |
| 3.2 | At the country level | 24 |
| 4. | Driving Forces, History and Major Actors Today | 28 |
| 4.1 | The first wave – the early empires | 29 |
| 4.2 | The second wave – the Age of Discoveries | 30 |
| 4.3 | The third wave – the Industrial Revolution | 31 |
| 4.4 | The forth wave – the Information Revolution | 33 |
| 4.5 | The current situation and the main actors | 38 |
| 4.5.1 | The World Trade Organization | 40 |
| 4.5.2 | The International Monetary Fund | 47 |
| 4.5.3 | The World Bank | 49 |
| 4.5.4 | Regional trade agreements and individual countries | 49 |
| 4.5.4.1 | The European Union | 50 |
| 4.5.4.2 | Other trade groupings | 53 |
| 4.5.4.3 | The United States of America | 54 |
| 4.5.4.4 | Japan | 57 |
| 4.5.5 | The transnational corporations | 58 |
| 4.5.6 | The antiglobalization movement | 60 |
| CHAPTER 2 OUTSOURCING | 64 | |
| 1. | Definition and Distinction from Similar Concepts | 64 |
| 2. | Development and Forms of Outsourcing | 66 |
| 2.1 | Some history | 67 |
| 2.2 | Types of outsourcing | 71 |
| 3. | The Debate on Outsourcing | 72 |
| 3.1 | Home country case | 73 |
| 3.1.1 | The theory… | 73 |
| 3.1.2 | … and the reality – the example of the USA | 80 |
| Cost savings | 80 | |
| Labor market effects | 81 | |
| Effects on productivity | 84 | |
| Effects on consumer welfare | 85 | |
| Effects on exports | 86 | |
| 3.2 | Host country case | 87 |
| 3.2.1 | The theory… | 87 |
| Direct effects | 87 | |
| Indirect effects – spillovers | 92 | |
| 3.2.2 | … and the reality – India and its emerging competitors | 94 |
| Employment effects | 95 | |
| Effect on output and exports | 98 | |
| Effect on wages | 101 | |
| Government revenues | 103 | |
| Competitiveness of human resources | 104 | |
| Effect on infrastructure | 105 | |
| Effect on country reputation | 107 | |
| Effect on the stability in the country | 108 | |
| 4. | Necessary Factors for Outsourcing | 109 |
| 4.1 | Factors in the client country | 109 |
| Labor market factors | 109 | |
| Regulatory framework | 109 | |
| Nature of the outsourced activities | 110 | |
| 4.2 | Factors in the supplier country | 110 |
| Cost advantage | 110 | |
| Sufficient labor pool | 110 | |
| Availability of skills | 110 | |
| Language proficiency | 111 | |
| Infrastructure | 111 | |
| Security and protection of intellectual property | 111 | |
| Cultural compatibility | 111 | |
| Time zone differences | 111 | |
| Legal framework and government support | 112 | |
| CHAPTER 3 OUTSOURCING AND BULGARIA | 113 | |
| 1. | Bulgaria and Its Future Accession to the EU – Related Economic Problems | 113 |
| 1.1 | Copenhagen economic criteria | 114 |
| Existence of a functioning market economy | 114 | |
| Capacity to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the Union | 115 | |
| 1.2 | Maastricht criteria | 117 |
| 1.3 | The Lisbon targets | 118 |
| 2. | SWOT and STEP Analysis of Bulgaria | 122 |
| 2.1 | SWOT analysis | 122 |
| Strengths | 123 | |
| Opportunities | 129 | |
| Weaknesses | 131 | |
| Threats | 133 | |
| 2.2 | STEP analysis | 134 |
| Social trends | 134 | |
| Technological trends | 136 | |
| Economic trends | 137 | |
| Political trends | 139 | |
| 3. | The Policies of the EU and Their Possible Impact on Bulgaria | 141 |
| 3.1 | Competition | 141 |
| 3.2 | Consumer protection | 143 |
| 3.3 | Monetary policy | 144 |
| 3.4 | Customs | 145 |
| 3.5 | Education and training | 145 |
| 3.6 | Employment and social affairs | 146 |
| 3.7 | Energy | 147 |
| 3.8 | Enterprises | 149 |
| 3.9 | Environment | 150 |
| 3.10 | External trade | 150 |
| 3.11 | Information society | 151 |
| 3.12 | The Internal Market | 152 |
| 3.13 | Health | 154 |
| 3.14 | Regional policy | 155 |
| 3.15 | Technology | 155 |
| 3.16 | Taxation | 156 |
| 3.17 | Transport | 156 |
| 4. | Potential Effects from Developing Offshore Outsourcing Capability | 157 |
| 4.1 | The case study – the software and related services industry | 158 |
| 4.2 | The macroeconomic dimension | 158 |
| 4.3 | Possible microeconomic effects | 162 |
| 4.4 | Other impact | 163 |
| Social | 163 | |
| Technological | 164 | |
| Political | 164 | |
| CONCLUSION | 165 | |
| APPENDIX 1 OUTSOURCING IN EUROPE – MAIN SUPPLIERS AND HOW DID IT HELP THEM IN SOLVIGN THEIR PROBLEMS | 167 | |
| APPENDIX 2 TABLES | 175 | |
| APPENDIX 3 FIGURES | 185 | |
| BIBLIOGRAPHY | 190 |
Bulgaria is about to join the European Union in 2007 or 2008 after a decade of negotiations and reforms. The last report of the European Commission on the progress of the reforms in Bulgaria has generally a positive evaluation. But although that a lot has been changed, there is still plenty to be done, if the country wants to be competitive enough in the Union and the world. This section will review what remains to be done in the economic area in order to meet successfully the challenges of the membership in a more and more competitive EU. The chapter will also examine how Bulgaria is positioned among the rest in Europe by analyzing its features and the ongoing trends. This together with a review of the Union’s policies and their possible effect on the Bulgarian economy will serve as a basis for the investigation of the question what could be the effect of developing a strong outsourcing sector on resolving the main economic problems of the country. [...]
falling prices, improved quality and increased broadband capacity. In the area of transportation infrastructure the nation’s spending has increased in the last years, aiming at developing the road and rail network and renovating and expanding the big airports (especially in the high-tech cities). Government investments have been directed also towards ensuring the power supply of the country. In China, the spending on infrastructure has been at high levels for quiet a long time, resulting in generally better and more extensive infrastructure in comparison to India. IT facilities and infrastructure is with much better quality in the special economic zones and in the coastal cities, where the bulk of economic activity is concentrated. Both countries possess very good R&D infrastructure, but the Indian one is renowned for the top-quality English-speaking engineers that it produces every year. The European competitors have as a rule better infrastructure than their Asian counterparts and they continue to improve it steadily. Such is the case of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Among the Central European countries, however, Hungary is far ahead, due to the early and successful completion of the privatization and the reforms in the sector. The R&D infrastructure is well-developed and is further being upgraded through its integration into the European Research Area and the utilization of EU funds. Russia is the other powerful emerging player in Europe in providing outsourced services with a notable specialization in software development. In connection to this the government has started only recently to provide more significant support to the sector in terms of improving infrastructural capabilities. IT infrastructure is improving its quality but its use is still very expensive and possible only in the large cities. In the beginning of 2005 President Putin announced a new government initiative to create and support national technology parks with the necessary infrastructure included. This may mark recognition from the side of the central government of the potential of the outsourcing industry and a possible shift from supporting the development and exporting of raw materials (oil, gas and timber) to that of IT products and the related services. Evidence for this shift may be found in the prediction of the Russian telecommunications minister that such exports may in 10 years reach the volume of the oil exports.77 Undoubtedly, however, Ireland is the leader among the outsourcing providers in Europe in terms of quality and quantity of infrastructure. Since the beginning of the 1990s the government has invested heavily in it in order to make Ireland further attractive to foreign [...]
their skills and competitiveness. At the other hand, however, the supplier companies, pressed by their foreign clients to deliver high quality services and products, translate these requirements lower in the supply chain to local suppliers. This pushes them also to demand high performance from their employees and to retrain them. So the effect of upgrading the skills and the competitiveness of the labor force is spread throughout the economy, making it more suitable for developing new higher-technology sectors and to establish trade relations with foreign companies at new level. Maybe more visible impact than the abovementioned will be that on the infrastructure of the country. Attracting overseas clients, who have a broad choice where to outsource, requires a “critical mass” of certain basic infrastructure – roads, ports and airports, water and electricity supply, basic communications, health facilities, etc. Depending on the specific activity that is going to be outsourced, the infrastructure requirements may be even higher, as for example in the case of outsourced IT-enabled services. Nevertheless, successful future development and expanding of the outsourcing sector will need further improvement of the infrastructure – building highways, expanding the capacity of ports and airports, introduction of high-speed communication links, making the water and electricity supply more reliable and cheaper and so on. This is, for instance, where the additional government revenues can be directed. On the other hand, improved and expanded infrastructure will be a favourable condition for the further improvement and development of the business services and so will generate additional national wealth. The development of the outsourcing industry in the country and its expansion and diversification, together with the improvements that it will bring in the quality of human resources, the infrastructure and the overall competitiveness of the local businesses, the overseas reputation of the country will grow. As an effect from this, more foreign investors and clients will be attracted and the economy will gain an even bigger impetus to grow. However, the impact of reputation on economic development could hardly be measured, if this is possible at all. As a further result from all the direct and indirect effects discussed above, the economic, social and political stability of the country will be positively influenced. The business will have a more secure short- and long-term prospective for development which will stimulate investment in new capacity. More jobs will be created and wages will grow and the overall prosperity of the people will increase. As productivity gets higher, less working hours will be needed to be spent in production or delivering services and people will have more leisure time. From the positive direction in the development of the country, the political life will also 93 [...]
In den Warenkorb
68,00 €
Link zur Arbeit:
http://www.diplom.de/ean/9783832497668
Arbeit zitieren:
Alexandroff, Plamen Dezember 2005: What could outsourcing bring to Bulgaria in an enlarged Europe?, Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag
Schlagworte:
Europäische Union, Osteuropa, Outsourcing, SWOT, Bulgarien




